Diagnostics Operations Command CenterReference-Lab Network · Client deployment (anonymized)
On-Premise · Live · Data never leaves the client network

Network Operations Command Center

One operating truth — unified from LIMS, inventory & logistics across both reference labs, satellites and collection centers. Nothing is replaced; Flux AI sits on top.

Reagent Wastage (MTD)
5.4%
▼ from 11.2% baseline
Network Days-of-Cover
18.6
3 SKUs below safety
Stockout Risk (14d)
4
SKUs flagged · ₹8.2L exposed
Specimen Rejection Risk
1.1%
▼ from 1.7% · 2 consignments at risk

⚡ Predicted Actions ranked by ₹ impact · 92% avg confidence

🔴
Stockout predicted — Elecsys Vitamin D (25-OH)Delhi NCR ref. lab · 11 days to stockout at current run-rate · vendor lead time 14 days→ Raise PO now, OR redistribute 220 tests from Mumbai surplus
94%confidence
🟠
Expiry risk — Sysmex CELLPACK DCL (Hematology)Mumbai · 3 lots (₹2.1L) expire in 22 days · projected usage covers only 60%→ Redistribute 2 lots to high-throughput Delhi NCR line
88%confidence
📈
Demand surge forecast — Dengue NS1 + IgMMonsoon onset · +180% demand predicted across western/northern satellites over 3 weeks→ Pre-position kits at Jaipur, Pune, Delhi NCR
91%confidence
🌡️
Cold-chain excursion — inbound consignment NSK-114Nashik → Mumbai · 9°C for 40 min · 18 chemistry samples at hemolysis risk→ Alert lab; pre-authorize re-draw for affected patients
87%confidence
Reorder optimized — HbA1c (Bio-Rad D-100)Reorder point recalculated; safety stock trimmed 18% with no stockout risk→ ₹1.4L working capital freed
96%confidence

🏥 Network Status days-of-cover

Mumbai
Central Reference Lab
21d
Delhi NCR
Reference Lab · North
9d
Pune
Satellite Lab
14d
Ahmedabad
Satellite Lab
19d
Jaipur
Satellite Lab
13d
Collection Centers
100+ · aggregate
OK

Network demand · last 30 days

Reagent & Consumable Demand Forecast

Per test × analyzer × lab. Learns seasonality, day-of-week and campaign spikes. Solid = actual · dashed = forecast · band = confidence interval.
Driven by daily LIMS test demand (captured continuously) and reconciled to month-end closing stock — no real-time consumption feed required.

SKU forecast

Actual consumption Flux AI forecast Confidence band

Inventory & Expiry — FEFO Control

Two failure modes, one screen. Stockout risk   Expiry risk   Healthy

🔁

Network redistribution suggested — save ₹2.1L + avert a stockout

Elecsys Vitamin D 25-OH: 220 tests' worth expiring unused at Delhi NCR in 18 days, while Mumbai is forecast to stock out in 11 days. Move 1 lot Delhi NCR → Mumbai instead of scrapping one and air-freighting the other. Net: zero wastage, zero stockout, no emergency PO.

Approve redistribution →

Reagent inventory · all labs A-class SKUs

Reagent / KitAnalyzerLabOn handDays coverNext expiryStatus
Vitamin D 25-OHRoche ElecsysMumbai3 kits114 Sep 2026Stockout 11d
Vitamin D 25-OHRoche ElecsysDelhi NCR9 kits414 Jul 2026Expiry 18d
CELLPACK DCLSysmex XNMumbai6 packs168 Jul 2026Expiry 22d
Dengue NS1 AgELISAJaipur120 tests62 Dec 2026Surge — reorder
HbA1c cartridgeBio-Rad D-100Mumbai14 boxes191 Nov 2026Healthy
TSH (3rd gen)Roche ElecsysDelhi NCR7 kits1320 Oct 2026Watch
BacT/ALERT bottlesbioMérieuxMumbai240 btl2415 Jan 2027Healthy
IHC antibody panelVentanaMumbai5 vials930 Aug 2026Stockout 9d
Stock at expiry risk
₹4.8L
7 lots within 30 days
Redistribution opportunity
₹3.6L
avoidable scrap + freight
Working capital freed (MTD)
₹6.2L
safety-stock optimization

Cold Chain & Specimen Integrity — the inbound specimen flow

Specimens move inbound from dozens of cities to the reference labs under 2–8 °C and a clock. Hemolysis is the #1 cause of rejection — Flux AI flags at-risk consignments in transit, before the analyzer does.

🌡️ Consignment NSK-114 — temperature trace Nashik → Mumbai

Probe temperature (°C) Excursion (>8 °C) Safe band 2–8 °C
⚠️
40-minute excursion at 9 °C detected en route18 chemistry samples (K+, LDH, AST) at elevated hemolysis risk · predicted rejection probability 73%→ Auto-alert sent to Mumbai receiving + pre-authorize re-draw

🚚 In-transit consignments live

RouteETATempRejection risk
Nashik → Mumbai (NSK-114)32 min9.0°CHigh 73%
Jaipur → Delhi NCR1h 10m5.2°CLow 4%
Ahmedabad → Mumbai2h 40m4.6°CLow 3%
Pune → Mumbai48 min7.8°CWatch 21%
Surat → Mumbai3h 05m6.1°CLow 6%
Rejection rate (MTD)
1.1%
▼ from 1.7%
Re-draws avoided (MTD)
214
proactive alerts

AI Assistant — ask your data in plain language

A private, on-prem GenAI assistant on top of the same unified layer — LIMS, inventory, procurement, logistics & reports. No dashboards to learn, no SQL. Ask in English (or Hindi). Nothing leaves the client's infrastructure.

💬 Flux Assistant private · on-prem LLM · role-based access

F
Hi 👋 I can answer questions across inventory, procurement, logistics and lab reports — and draft POs, summaries and alerts. Try a question below, or type your own.

🧠 GenAI capabilities on the same platform

💬
Conversational data accessNatural-language Q&A across inventory, TAT, procurement & patient reports — for staff who'll never open a BI tool.
📄
Report & result summarizationAuto-summarize a patient's histopathology / molecular report into a clinician-ready précis with key flags highlighted.
🧾
Document intelligence — PO / GRN / invoiceExtract line items from vendor invoices & delivery notes, 3-way match against PO & GRN, flag mismatches automatically.
📑
Vendor-contract & SOP Q&A"What's the agreed lead time and penalty clause for Roche?" — answered from your contracts, with citations.
✍️
Drafting & actionsDraft POs, reorder alerts, vendor emails and shift-handover notes — reviewed and approved by your team.
🔒
Private & governedOn-prem model, role-based access (a phlebotomist ≠ a planner ≠ a pathologist), every answer auditable & cited.

Demo responses are scripted on representative client data. In a deployment the assistant is grounded on the client's own systems with retrieval + citations, so answers are traceable to source records.

How we validate — & the value

Nobody trusts the AI on day one. It earns trust on the client's data, in shadow mode, against success metrics the client sets.

✅ Validation pipeline

1

Backtest on history

Train on 18–24 months; test on the most recent 3 months it never saw. Report MAPE, forecast bias, and stockout-catch rate per A-class SKU.

2

Shadow mode (parallel run)

6–8 weeks running alongside today's process, changing nothing. Planners see "model said X, reality was Y" weekly. Zero operational risk.

3

Champion / challenger

Switch a subset of SKUs / one lab to AI-recommended ordering vs. the old method. Success metrics agreed up front. Only SKUs that beat baseline graduate.

4

Human-in-the-loop

System proposes, the team disposes. Every recommendation approvable/overridable; overrides logged and learned from. On-prem, read-only, fully explainable — NABL-friendly.

📊 Value delivered representative engagement

−40–55%
Reagent wastage
(≈10% → ≈5%)
−60–75%
Stockout events
on key SKUs
−15–25%
Working capital
tied in inventory
80–90%
Forecast accuracy
(MAPE, A-class)
−30–50%
Specimen rejection
/ re-draw rate
↑ TAT
Supply-driven TAT
breaches cut

Figures from a representative diagnostics-network engagement, benchmarked against published industry data (reagents ≈50% of lab opex; ~10% commodity wastage; hemolysis = leading rejection cause).

How a typical engagement starts — a 4–6 week, on-premise PoC

One use case, one success metric agreed up front, deployed on the client's own servers. Lowest data lift, fastest measurable ₹ — and the natural foundation for every other module.

📅 The 4–6 week proof of concept

Week 1
Connect & scope

Deploy Flux AI on-prem. Read-only connectors to LIMS + inventory. Pick 2–3 high-value reagent categories and agree the success metric.

Weeks 2–3
Backtest & shadow run

Train on 18–24 months of history; test on unseen months. Run alongside today's process — predicting, changing nothing. Report MAPE, bias, stockout-catch.

Weeks 4–5
Champion / challenger

Switch the chosen SKUs to AI-recommended ordering vs. the old method, like-for-like. Measure against the agreed metric, human-in-the-loop throughout.

Week 6
Review & decide

Results readout vs. baseline — wastage, stockouts, accuracy, ₹ impact. Clear go / no-go and a roadmap to expand modules & labs.

🎯 Scope

  • One use case: reagent demand forecasting + expiry control
  • 2–3 high-value reagent categories (e.g. immunoassay, hematology)
  • One reference lab (add the second for the network-balancing story)
  • One agreed success metric — e.g. cut wastage X% / catch ≥Y% of stockouts

🔌 What we need

  • Read-only access to LIMS + inventory/ERP
  • 18–24 months of historical consumption & orders
  • Batch/expiry & vendor lead-time data
  • A named operations sponsor + ~2 hrs/week of a planner's time

✅ What you get

  • Flux AI deployed on your infrastructure — data never leaves
  • Measured accuracy & ₹-impact, validated on your data
  • No disruption — sits on existing systems, workflows unchanged
  • No-regret exit: if it doesn't beat your process on the metric, nothing is lost
🚀

Why start here

Demand forecasting + expiry control needs the least data, carries zero operational risk (on-prem, read-only, shadow-first), and returns the fastest, hardest-to-argue rupee value — turning wastage straight into margin. Once it's proven on your numbers, the cold-chain, network-balancing and GenAI-assistant modules build on the exact same unified data layer.

Typical next step: scoping workshop →

Illustrative mock-up populated with representative client data. In a deployment, Flux AI runs on the client's own infrastructure and is trained on the client's own data. · Trinesis Technologies · Flux AI